CCCFE Faculty News Notes June/July 2013
June 28, 2013
Clarification of the Due
Dates for Final Grade Submission:
The posting
of final grades on line is due eight days (business days) after the last day of
final exams. The reason for this
submission date—which has always been in our contract—is so that students will
be able to enroll in classes for the subsequent semester or summer session
before the supporting documentation for the final grades is due. The supporting documentation deadline is sent
out by email from ECC, and that is usually ten days after the on-line posting
is due. Therefore, it is important that
your grades be posted by 8 business days days following the last day of finals
to avoid being on the list of faculty submitting grades late. The Federation
has informed the District that the two seemingly contradictory emails sent to
Compton faculty, one from the offices of Academic Affairs and Student affairs
claiming that grades need to be submitted 10 unspecified days, following final
exams, and the other from Torrance, are unclear and therefore confusing to
faculty as to when the grades really need to be in. Remember: 8
business days from the last day of final exams for the on-line posting of
grades; documentation is due on the day
indicated by the Torrance campus. The
District has been claiming that the time required for posting is ten
unspecified days; the contract says
otherwise, and very clearly states 8 business days ( that is, Monday – Friday).
It is apparent that the District is counting Saturdays, whereas the Federation
counts business days as the standard workweek of Monday through Friday. This matter needs to be resolved during the
current negotiations.
Flex Credit Alert:
A number of faculty members have not as yet submitted
their hours for flex credit. Perhaps some
may have forgotten to do so by the end of the semester. It is essential that you maintain careful
records of the hours you have spent in acquiring flex credits and submit them
at the end of each semester. 12 hours
are required for each semester—or 24 each year.
This is part of your professional obligation. Please see page 64,
Section 16.4 of the Federation contract.
Negotiations Up-Date:
Some talk
and no action sums up the progress;
however, the negotiating team will meet with the District’s team on
Tuesday, July 2. We have gotten quite close to an agreement on evaluation
procedures. The basic evaluation has additional requirements: a mini-portfolio that includes professional
development, and samples of class assignments, syllabi, assessments, and
reflections. We have managed to reduce the number of division chair duties and
responsibilities, given the new organizational structure, but we are not in
agreement with other items proposed by the District in the division chair
article. Since there is no agreement in
this area, five chairs remain in the structure—however haphazardly the
disciplines have been aligned or
combined. The 20% reassigned time and the stipend will remain for this year; the District—favoring a 3-chair structure—had
proposed a 40% reassigned time for each chair, but with no stipend, except for $2,000
for summer work. We rejected that . Faculty members can readily see the
District’s intent in this reorganization and in the intent to reduce the number
of chairs and the cost of their positions.
You might also notice on the reorganizational plan that any potential
savings to the district are earmarked to support classified assistants’
positions for the three deans.
A Word about the Budget:
Prop 30
money is not new money coming into the district; it is like a back-fill or stabilization funds
to provide the district the financial ability to operate at the 2011 level,
when mid-year cuts were severe. In some districts, it allows for the rehiring
of faculty and staff who were laid off as a result of the severe cuts. In other districts it allows for the
restoration of classes that had been cut from the schedule and for the increase
in part-time staffing. The point is that
this is not an augmentation to the budget;
it is a restoration of the 2011 funding level.
The May
Revise budget shows a potential 1.57% COLA and possible growth funding; these funds have not been secured. We will keep you apprised as to what happens
to this potential income to the district.
The major
problem—as far as how any possible new money may be used-- is that the District
has repeatedly stuck to a preference for adding new positions (8 faculty
positions) and, with Prop 30 money, restoring 150 class sections to the
schedule.
Equity for Whom?
The
District, in reorganizing itself, has equalized the workload for the deans, asd
the reorganization of disciplines gives each dean a roughly equal number of
FTEF (full-time equivalent faculty) load between 47.9 and 49.9, with the
Turducken Division # 3 (Math/English and Library LRC) having the most
FTEF: 49.93. It has a reasonably equalized distribution of
FTES, ranging from 786.8 to 937.8 –with the Turducken Division #2 (VocTech and
Social Science and Fine Arts) having the lion’s share at 937.85.
·
The workload for the Deans is mitigated by the
two division chairs assigned to Division 1 and Divison 2.
·
The Deans’ workload is further reduced by
instructional coordinators, instructional assistants and administrative
assistants.
·
Turducken #3 has only one division chair and
what appears to be a head librarian position.
·
While the Chairs in Division 1 have
approximately 23.95 FTEF each, and the Chairs in Division 2 (including Social
Science, Fine Arts, Voc Tech and business) have 24.5, the one division chair
for Division 3 –another Turducken—has 49.9 FTEF, in other words, the most full
and part-time faculty to work with in the scheduling of classes and
coordinating faculty evaluations.
Surely equity is not the province only of deans. If the
District is willing to provide equitable workloads for administrators, in this
case academic deans, and ostensibly by
happenstance, whim, or deliberation to some division chairs, but not to
another, we should all be reminded of a fundamental tenet of unions: an injury to one is an injury to all, in this
case all faculty.
If you’re
not familiar with a turducken, it’s a chicken and a duck stuffed into a turkey.
Benefits Sign-up period
will be early this year:
Because we
are returning to a ten-month payroll distribution cycle this year, the benefits
sign up period will be held earlier than its usual time at the beginning of the
fall semester. Because of new reporting
regulations, it is necessary to have the sign up period mid-summer so that the
benefits can be reflected on the first paycheck for August. The sign up period
this year will be July 15 – July 30, 2013. Human Resources will be sending out
additional information and provisions that will be made for faculty who are out
of town on vacation.
There will
also be new rates, which Human Resources will announce in the letter that will
be sent out to all full-time faculty.
- Potential
Restoration of Part-time Benefits:
The news looks very promising for
part-time faculty who have met the requirements for medical benefits, as it
appears that the state will be funding colleges for this much needed benefit
for adjunct instructors.. Last year,
eligible adjuncts were notified during flex day that they would not be getting
any medical benefits due to the state’s fiscal crisis and consequent inability
to reimburse districts for the cost of health coverage for adjunct
faculty. In accordance with Section 18.7
of the contract and Ed. Code section
87860 et. seq., to be eligible for benefits, the adjunct faculty member must
have been working 40% of a full-time load for two consecutive semesters and
have been assigned a 40% load for the third consecutive semester. These provisions are on page 67 of the
current contract. If you have questions,
you can contact any of the union officers.
Check with Human Resources
mid-July for more concrete information about the current benefits.
- Medicare
Eligibility Reporting:
Some faculty members who are
eligible—or have been eligible for Medicare—have not notified the
District. It is a contractual
requirement that when you become Medicare eligible that you inform the district
and sign up for Medicare parts A and B.
The District pays for your Medicare coverage, and Medicare becomes your
primary health care at the time. Signing
up for Medicare does NOT necessitate your taking your social security benefit
payments. If you are age 64 and a half
or older, you need to notify the local social security office and sign up for
Medicare and notify the district immediately.
Failure to comply has serious consequences, especially when you do claim
social security, as you can lose 10% per year of your social security benefits
if you fail to contact social security and Medicare. This draconian measure is Social Security
policy; it is not a mean spiritedness of
the District. I doubt that anyone would
have realized the dire consequences of neglecting the reporting responsibility
had we not been informed by the Social Security and Medicare representatives
that provided a workshop to potential retirees late this past spring.
It has come
to our attention that a number of retirees have been paying for their own
Medicare supplemental policies; the
District is contractually obligated to do so, but has never notified any
retiree of any process for verifying the coverage through Medicare. This will need to be clarified and the
information distributed to those eligible for Medicare prior to the sign-up
period.
.
Comments
Post a Comment