Working Draft--Letter to the Benefits Committee from the CCCFE Union
Dear Member of the Compton Community College District’s
Benefit’s Committee:
As representatives of the Compton Community College
Federation of Employees, Local 3486, we kindly request that the Benefits
Committee re-evaluate the current benefits package offered to the faculty. We have received numerous complaints about
the overall costs of providing healthcare for a family. Although the District provided a $12,000 per
year contribution towards benefits, it has done very little in terms of
reducing the burden for families and has proven to erode the competitive nature
of the District in terms of hiring and retaining new faculty members.
1.
2014-2015.
With $12,000 dollars as a district contribution, a family will still
incur additional out of pocket costs and reductions to the faculty member’s
take home salary. Kaiser’s HMO costs $2202.95
per month. The out of pocket costs for
an employee would be 1002.95 per month.
Although the salary might indicate a healthy take home wage, the costs
of paying just for Kaiser effectively reduces the salary rate by $1000 dollars
per month. Hypothetically if take home
pay was around 3500 per month, it would be reduced to $2500 a month
effectively. This functions like a pay-cut.
2.
Other districts have been much more
competitive. Long Beach City College
effective covers a family at a out of pocket cost of $150.00 per month AND
includes dental and vision. El Camino
College offers PERSCare, a Cadillac plan, at $355.12 out of pocket costs for a
family. The plans are often better, and
the overall costs are significantly lower.
Solutions.
1.
The Union
proposes that the Benefits committee considers opening up a bidding process for
the contracting of benefits services. We
believe in capitalism and the power of the market.
2.
We would propose that our District would offer
the same District contribution rates for families as El Camino College--$1593.00.
Why? We have an
example. The District had hired Gabriel
Gomez as an English professor in the 2013-2014 academic year. Because of the nature of the health benefits
package, he has chosen to move on. It was
not the salary schedule that bothered him, nor his long commute to Compton, but
rather how the benefits package eroded his take home pay rate. If the District intends to compete for the
best talent in California, we must be competitive in this area. With no changes, the Union would not be
surprised that we will lose more talent to the job market which will only get
more competitive in California.
Recruiting and retaining faculty talent is important if the District intends
to obtain accreditation.
We look forward to hearing from you in terms of a solution. Again, it is our hope that the District
understands the nature of a Capitalist market.
Regards
David Hideo Maruyama
Secretary
CCCFE Local 3486
Comments
Post a Comment